Cash Legos hold stacking! Finance Redefined 4/21-4/28

0
34



Glad Wednesday fellow DeFi degens! 

I used to be anticipating to spend a big portion of this version of Finance Redefined analyzing Aave’s liquidity mining program. There was some anxiousness from buyers that the emission of two,200 $AAVE per day (which might translate to roughly 5% of the ecosystem reserve fund of two.8 million AAVE per yr) would possibly find yourself dragging down the token’s worth as farmers earn and dump.  

Seems, it is pointless: this system’s an unmitigated success. The AAVE token is up almost 15% because the launch of liquidity mining to $462, and the protocol’s whole worth locked determine has surged to $11.8 billion — up from simply over $7 billion since liquidity mining started.

Properly-researched liquidity mining works. Solely query now’s, if this system is discontinued, how a lot of that TVL can be sticky? 

Different narratives to control: 

Cash legos hold stacking

At first of the yr there was hypothesis that in 2021 DeFi would see one thing of a novelty: one protocol buying one other, doubtless by way of a governance token buyout. The Synthetix 2021 roadmap particularly opened the door to such a risk, evaluating it to acquisitions in TradFi and trying to Yearn’s merger/acquisition/collaboration spree for inspiration. 

Giant-scale mergers and acquisitions have but to play out, nonetheless. There are some smaller examples brewing — Inverse Finance is currently trying to purchase out Tonic for some $1.6 million, as an illustration — however as an alternative what we’re seeing is a growth in deep integrations on the protocol and frontend layers.

https://twitter.com/InverseFinance/status/1387335256462798848

On Monday, Badger DAO and RenVM launched the Badger Bridge, a brand new interface for depositing native BTC into Badger vaults with only a few clicks. The mixing stands out for 2 causes. One is that it’s so clearly useful for each events: an idiot-proof approach to earn yield on BTC is engaging for hodlers, which means Ren will see an uptick in exercise on its bridge (and subsequently protocol charges), whereas Badger likewise will get a lift in TVL.

The opposite angle, nonetheless, is the willingness with which Ren subordinated its branding, letting Badger — which, I’d argue, has the stronger neighborhood — take over the touchdown web page. Had been it not for absurd token valuations, one may need been an acquisition goal for the opposite, given the apparent wants every fills — however by working collectively Ren will get all the pieces they’d need from a protocol like Badger, and the identical applies to Badger and Ren.

This raises the query: why hassle with takeovers when a pleasant integration can accomplish the identical results?

One other prime instance is as we speak’s Balancer-Gnosis Protocol announcement. You can see the details in my piece, however successfully Balancer v2 is bringing some neat improvements to AMM liquidity provision and Gnosis’ CowSwap is a liquidity aggregator and offchain transaction batching protocol that can reportedly in the reduction of on miner extractable worth. The mixture of the 2 will make for a considerably extra feature-rich DEX from each a LP and dealer’s perspective — presumably even positioning the Balancer-Gnosis-Protocol as a Uniswap v3 competitor.

In an announcement to Cointelegraph, Balancer CEO Fernando Martinelli famous that such a deep collaboration can be unimaginable within the conventional finance world:

“Every of the 2 protocols can be unimaginable to implement within the conventional finance world just because there isn’t a such factor as trustlessness there (you at all times want an middleman). Even when that have been potential, combining these two protocols can be as a lot of a problem as it might be to combine Constancy Index Funds (Balancer) with Nasdaq (Gnosis) below one single platform.”

Acquisitions could also be an outdated mannequin. Interoperability and composability signifies that protocols can profit from each other with out hostile takeovers.

The branding would possibly nonetheless must get found out, nonetheless — Balancer-Gnosis-Protocol isn’t precisely the perfect title.

Are you talking my language? 

The goalposts hold transferring for Ethereum maximalists as natural exercise begins to unfold to different chains. 

On Solana, as an illustration, $COPE and $STEP have attracted important neighborhood following and funding from main gamers (together with from funds apart from famous SOL supporters Alameda Analysis!), and this morning introduced a hackathon aiming to kick off the hashtag “solanaszn.” Other people have bandied round “Solana Summer season” within the mould of final yr’s DeFi Summer season, however no matter your most well-liked sobriquet the competitors is for actual.

The success has — maybe predictably — led some observers to try to poke holes in SOL’s development thesis. Whereas, like several chain, there’s loads of assault floor, one rising criticism is that Solana’s flagship language, Rust, is each tough and unique.

In an announcement to Cointelegraph, Solana founder and present Solana Basis president Anatoly Yakovenko rejected that view. 

“Rust is a contemporary language with broad adoption appropriate for writing excessive efficiency safe code. It has ranked on Stack Overflow as one of the liked programming language by 65,000 individuals who code, so we’re assured this performs a key function in driving the natural development in our developer neighborhood thus far,” he stated.

He additionally famous that the Basis has counted 2,000 builders constructing on Solana (he didn’t point out methodology or definitions used to reach on the determine, and it appears maybe a contact inflated given {that a} 2019 examine from ConsenSys found that there’s about 1,300 Ethereum builders, and in 2020 Electrical Capital pegged the whole variety of ETH devs round 2,300), and that Solana devs aren’t inquisitive about “copy/pastes” of Ethereum tasks.

He’s additionally proper concerning the Stack Overflow study, although a 2018 survey from the Rust Weblog confirmed that over 20% of builders working with the language felt unproductive after a yr of use.

No matter you’re feeling about Rust, nonetheless, it’s doubtless an issue that cash can repair. And to that finish Solana is urgent the pedal: the hackathon will function “as much as $1 million” in prizes and/or seed funding. I believe I might study a troublesome language for that.

Different tales this week:

Uranium Finance loses $50 million, likely rug

ETH cracks all-time highs

Aave’s liquidity mining program a success out of the gate

NYSE president bullish on DeFi